It would be wonderful to have a special button on your keyboard that would read your writing and correct every error, typo, wrong word, omitted word, added word, or verb tense. It would be really amazing if the “edit key” would automatically rewrite awkward sentences, paragraphs, or chapters. There are software packages that attempt to go beyond the rigidity of spell/grammar-check, but do they do a better job?
No, not really, or only marginally. The computer or software package would have to comprehend the content, distinguish whether the entire piece has a theme, rewrite sentences and paragraphs to support that theme, and draw a convincing conclusion.
How can the basic rules of grammar or spelling downloaded into a software package cover all the exceptions to the rules in language and enhance the quality of the writing? It is not possible. Technology cannot grasp ideas and concepts; nor can it recognize the effectiveness of an argument to convince someone to buy, sell, invest, fund a grant, or use your company. There is no way a machine can determine the feasibility of a fictional plot. It cannot keep track of consistency, clarity, or accuracy. Software certainly doesn’t know the twists and turns of your storyline or the research that only a person can select to support facts. A computer does not have the imagination to create stories and fantasies.
One example of spell/grammar-check or editing software is that it won’t highlight a word as long as the term is in the dictionary, whether it makes sense or not. How many times have you seen “from” as “form” in printed media? Probably a lot, and the list of misses on editing/reviewing software goes on and on. It can be your best friend or your worst enemy.
The human element cannot be replaced by technology. How many people realize that the little blue underline on WORD that supposedly points out grammatical errors appears when there is, perhaps, another way to present the same material? In other words, your writing may not be wrong at all or it could be showing you there is a valid mistake. That is what the human being can determine and the computer cannot. Use spell/grammar-check as a guide and look at what is highlighted in your writing, but take it with a grain of salt … or maybe a pound of salt.
It gets really upsetting, however, when WORD or another software program changes a word automatically after you’ve typed it. Many times it can be helpful, but many times it can totally augment the meaning of what you’re writing.
Verb tenses are difficult for ALL writers, including myself. We think in present tense, but we write in a variety of tenses, including third-person past. I leave the verbs for my last rewrite, and I’m always surprised at how many verbs need to be changed. This brings me to the rewriting/editing/proofreading process.
My antiquated computer graphics is not near as antiquated as the books and especially the pencils and erasers in the cup. How I wish the pencils were red! I use a combination of traditional skills and new computer skills to write, edit, design, and format all types of printed media, including book manuscripts. As a fiction author myself, I enjoy many genres of books to edit, proofread, and review, including nonfiction, but I can’t edit or proofread my own writing successfully. I need another human being to see what my eyes will not notice, even though my eye has been educated and trained for many years to pickup on “glitches”.
If you write or even type something, it becomes engrained in your brain, basically memorized. It is an organic, biological function of your gray matter. It is something we in the present evolution of humankind cannot change. In the future, perhaps? But then, would we be more machine than human?
When you try to edit/proofread what you have written, your eyes see what they expect to see. You read over errors, typos, and other editorial problems. You can be reading it aloud–which I suggest so that you can hear discrepancies and determine if the writing flows smoothly–and actually say the word that you think is there, not the word that is in print. Mind boggling, but it is a biological fact.
The brain is like a computer (probably the old computer that I pictured above, depending on your age)–data in/data out–good, bad, or indifferent. Have you ever noticed that a person misspells or mispronounces the same words all the time? It was initially engrained in the brain that way so it’s what comes out. The more times you use a term incorrectly, the more engrained it becomes; therefore to you, it sounds and looks correct. Our minds, which are more connected to our conscious, unpremeditated thoughts, allow us to change what is engrained in the hard drive of our brains. You can change your mind, but not the organ which is your brain.
The important principle I want to point out is you should never be upset with yourself if someone else finds an error in your writing. It is not your fault; it’s human nature. To prevent this from happening, rely on a human being, preferably an editor who knows the rules and especially the exceptions to the rules for writing, spelling, grammar, punctuation, correct phrasing and terminology, and the correct tense of verbs. This is referred to as a copy editor.
A further step to make your writing the best and most professional it can be is to work with a content and development editor. Believe it or not, there are rules on how a piece should be written. In overly simplistic form: a theme, definition and support of the theme, and a conclusion. Having a plan to follow keeps you from writing yourself into a corner (writer’s block) or writing in circles (long, drawn-out passages with no action or support to the theme/plot). It’s very frustrating to know where you want to go with a writing project and not have a roadmap to get there.
Even though I have done all levels of writing and editing, from simple copyediting and proofreading to complete ghost writing, I can write myself into a corner or wander in circles just like anyone else. And I do believe the hardest thing for any writer to do is to cut their own words, but it is necessary to weed out the extraneous material that can confuse or lose your readers.
A suggested roadmap:
- Write in chapters, sections, or all the way through, depending on how your mind works best.
- Put it aside for as long as you can, from a few days to a few weeks. You might even want to work on something else to allow your brain to switch gears.
- Read the material, correcting as many editorial problems as you can find; rewriting awkward phrasing or passages that could be misunderstood or ambiguous; look for discrepancies–Have you ever read a book where the character’s name changes halfway through the manuscript?–and don’t be afraid to cut, cut, cut if it does not support the theme, advance your plot, or add to the story/mission of the writing.
- Description: I personally love poetic prose, but it can be overdone. Read your descriptive passages with a eagle eye, keeping what sets the scene or mood. If you have a descriptive passage, be sure and follow it with an action passage. If you have a ghastly, disturbing scene, follow it with something a little lighter, but keep it real. Some articles or manuscripts have to have disturbing revelations because it is the truth of the matter–be it in fiction, nonfiction, or any other media.
- Editing: Now is the time for an editor. Always submit in double-spaced format. Very early in the manuscript, an editor will be able to tell you what level of editing you need–from copy editing to a massive rewrite to sending it back and telling you that is isn’t ready for editing yet. Hopefully, the editor will give you some suggestions or in all kindness, let you know if the writing field is not for you. I, personally, do a gratis reading of the first chapter or a single chapter of your choice to ascertain these issues.
- Proofreading comes last, after formatting has been done, and is read only for typos and errors.
I know it sounds like a long process, but there are no shortcuts to literary acceptance.
Deborah A. Bowman, CEO, http://www.clasidconsultantspublishing.com
Write it. Read it. Act on it. Share it with others.
Literacy professional excellence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I find this article both fascinating and true, Deborah. Poetry and vignettes don’t necessarily have a beginning, middle, and end the way a story does. When I write stories I must kick my brain into a different gear and overwriting poetic prose is definitely a weak area for me. My brain often stays in poetry mode. It’s true too, if I walk away from the work for a time, I can see the thickness of the description and rewrite.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Laine Anne, I want to really thank you for your comments. I, too, as you know, write poetry as well as fiction. But I was a business/technical writer for many years as well. Yet, I have been criticized on occasion for too much descriptive writing. I had to learn the hard way that what I like is not what has mass appeal in the day and age. Literary classical writers like Charles Dickens would never be published today. How sad, but we have to keep up with the changes in the industry. I share my own evolution as a writer and an editor. I’m so glad you were able to relate to my experiences.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing this helpful information.
It just goes to show that no matter how much technology you may have at your finger tips, it is still the human eye and mind that has the last say and best result.
That said, behind every brilliant piece of technology there is a human brain and when writing, it must be the editor that puts that last centre piece of the jig saw puzzle in, that completes your novel for publishing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You have summed it up so succinctly and perfectly!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thoroughly enjoy editing, but oh, how I would love a proofreading button!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on deborahjay and commented:
Words of wisdom on the editing process – great information, especially if you haven’t yet embarked on this essential step.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Deborah, thank you so much!
LikeLiked by 1 person
SUCH a good piece -saved me from having to write my own version 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Deb, this is a fantastically informative, yet entertaining truth of the writing process. I will be reblogging this soon! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on .
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much. Judith!
LikeLike
Love it. Rational, cogent and sensible explanation.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Smorgasbord – Variety is the spice of life and commented:
Editing is one of those activities that we tend to leave to the last moment. We might read through our work and spell check and add some commas but there comes a time when we actually develop to much familiarity with our own work. This is where an editor comes in. Here is an excellent post by Deborah Bowman on the importance of editing a book before publication.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Chris The Story Reading Ape's Blog and commented:
Deborah Gives great advice 👍
LikeLike
I agree with much of what you wrote, but I don’t agree with this: “…or in all kindness, let you know if the writing field is not for you.”
That’s the worst thing one can do to aspiring writers.
This would have been a better place to stop your sentence: “Hopefully, the editor will give you some suggestions…”
What is the harm in offering a suggestion as opposed to shattering a dream?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Florida, I greatly appreciate your feedback. I thought long and hard about the phrase you mentioned. I took it out a couple of times, but then decided I had to put it back in. I have been an editor for 30 years and some books, some would-be writers, no matter how much editing is done, no matter how much rewriting, will never create a consistent, believable plot/story. A person who has the dream of being a writer will only be more miserable when the dream isn’t realized, I absolutely agree. Why prolong the heartbreak over years or decades, especially if the writer is spending $$$ in promotion and self-publishing contracts with no return on their investment? I find honesty the best policy, and I always deliver it with kindness and love. I’ve known editors who actually insult people, and that is inexcusable. I do qualify that this refers to fiction only. I do ghost writing for nonfiction, technical, and business media and manuscripts, but I do not do ghost writing for fiction, which I feel must have the originality of the author. If the plot is sound or can be made sound with some suggestions and rewriting, I enjoy mentoring writers to achieve their best. I thank you for pointing this out, giving me your opinion, and allowing me to respond. I am humbled and grateful. I look forward to reading your blog as well. Best wishes, Deborah
LikeLiked by 1 person
I appreciate the explanation and that you took time to consider your response. Thanks.
LikeLike
A most illuminating post. Whew. So much in the process.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Kim's Author Support Blog.
LikeLike
I proofread after every draft and ask my wife to proofread after every draft and before I submit I ask one or two friends from my writers’ circle to look too (not just for proofreading but for concept problems I may have missed). No matter how irritated I get, I always listen, and usually I have to admit that if something bothered the reader something’s off in my prose. I’ve been writing for more than forty years but I can still mangle a sentence.
LikeLike
Fantastic post, Deborah! Tweeted it – great work!
LikeLike
Thank you, I am honored you took the time to check out my blog. I am very proud of the authors whom I edit, rewrite, and serve as ghostwriter. They are winning awards!
LikeLike