The Challenges of Proofreading and How to Express Yourself in the Use of Words

Ever Wish You Had Another Pair of Fresh Eyes?
Ever Wish You Had Another Pair of Fresh Eyes?

Unfortunately, a new pair of glasses won’t change your preconceived judgments, criticism, and bad habits. You just can’t wipe away a lifetime of engrained programming.

Editing and proofreading is a learned skill. You train your physical eyes to see errors, typos, and inconsistencies–things that just don’t make sense or are contradictory to previously stated fact or fiction. This is a different skill set than reading. You have to slow down, read each word separately, then each phrase or clause, making sure it’s a complete sentence, and check the construction of the sentence to make sure the objects, prepositions, verb tenses, and subject(s) are in a logical parallel pattern. Lastly, you go back to the beginning of the sentence, paragraph, or piece to check the validity of the statement in conjunction with  the rest of the facts in an expository or the forward progressive action in fiction.

Your mind’s eye is a little harder to train. The mind’s eye is a collection of programmed data that has been input into cellular, organic gray matter since the day you were born. The conflicting material is a little overwhelming, to say the least. The number of times you’ve spelled or used a word incorrectly may far outweigh the times you’ve seen it correctly. So what’s going to pop up in your database, the brain, when you do a search/retrieve? The wrong, more plentiful data, of course. But a firm, conscious override of what has been programmed previously will stick, if only you could see with fresh, uncensored eyes.

The training begins anew, guiding your physical eyes to notice things you would normally just read right over, especially if it’s your own writing. Those of you who’ve read my editing/proofreading tips before know that I’m a firm believer that you cannot peruse your own writing for errors, typos, inaccuracies, and inconsistencies. What’s engrained in your computer database or brain is what you think is there, not necessarily what your physical eyes are seeing. A professional editor is still your best investment, but there are a few tricks that can fool the physical eye into seeing what is really there and not what your mind’s eye perceives. This would be like fresh data to the brain.

  1. Read sections, sentences, paragraphs out of order. I’ve known many proofreaders who read things backwards, sometimes one letter at a time.This, of course, only works for catching typos and errors. Inaccuracies and inconsistencies won’t be seen if you’re reading in  nonsensical fashion. This process works best if you’re reading/spelling aloud with two people swapping off and reading to each other. Two heads are better than one? Two sets of eyes and ears are even better!
  2. Your Kindle, e-reader or app can change-up your writing to make it appear somewhat fresh by enlarging the text, changing the font or typeface, changing the color, and especially switching the background to black with white type. Sometimes that’s just the ticket to make errors pop!
  3. If the eyes and brain are programmable, data-driven organs, use something else, like auditory. Use your Kindle or computer voice to read to you. A multitude of errors and misspellings can be heard in awkward phrasing, mispronunciations. Extra words, doubled words, left out words, wrong words are very noticeable in auditory.
  4. Using a professional editor or proofreader is always, still, your best bet. Spell-cheek, grammar-check, and so-called editing or grammar software packages are as finite as your operating system. If it makes a word, it makes logical computer sense to a computer. That does not make it the right word. Nor does it catch inverted construction (different languages have different sentence construction),  repeated words, left out words, and will never pick-up inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and errors in content.

The last item I’d like to share is cadence. Have you ever read some authors where the words just glide through your mind with flowing, almost poetic smoothness? Edgar Allen Poe was the master at this. Poets are known for keeping the cadence rhythmic. But this idea of fluidity can be applied to any type of writing–business, technical, essays, academic papers, and especially advertising and promotional media. Read your own writing back to yourself aloud, record it, listen to it in your own voice and inflection. Is it catchy, creative, smooth, persuasive, dramatic?

Other Points to Consider: Have you used the same word or words too repetitively? That gets boring to read very quickly. Do you have trouble reading an awkward sentence? Does it make logical sense or is it too rambling, ambiguous, losing momentum and cadence?  Is it too long, too short; are you too repetitious in your ideas? Does each sentence have a subject, a verb, and an object or predicate? Do you have your clarifying remarks in the correct order? Does the entire piece have a dominant theme, supporting material, and a conclusion? Then look at each paragraph under the same premise–an opening sentence, substantiated information, and a conclusion that is linked to the theme. Paragraphs are just mini essays that support the whole concept.

Writing is considered a free expression of thought and creativity, but if you want to make your point, there are tried-and-true steps to follow to get that point across.

Design your writing with your words, an expression of yourself!
Design your writing with your words, an expression of yourself!

Best wishes on manuscripts and media that say much about you, the writer, in subtle clarity that speaks for itself.

Deborah A Bowman

Editorial Tips: What If You Really Mess Up?

Just this weekend I posted a blog with a misspelled word in the heading–“dos” instead of “does”. Well, my Spanish isn’t good enough to pawn it off as the number two, which didn’t make sense anyway, so there I was with the only line showing on the link broadcasting my error. A delightful friend immediately sent me a comment on Facebook, “Is this an editor’s test? lol” Why didn’t I just go with it and say, “Yes!”? I caught it and fixed it right after I hit “Publish” on WordPress, but since I have automatic share for Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Google, it was out there for all to see. In my haste to remedy this, I sent the whole post to trash. It was a rather lengthy poem with visually descriptive words, now lost and gone forever, except for the heading postings everywhere which now link to nothing.

A Magic Button on Your Keyboard to Fix Everything ... Wouldn't That Be Nice?
A Magic Button on Your Keyboard to Fix Everything … Wouldn’t That Be Nice?

As much as every writer and editor would love to have an all-knowing editing key or a magic wand to clean up any discrepancies and errors/typos in a manuscript, business letter, a blog posting, even an email, it just doesn’t exist. The human element of eyes, ears, and touch remains the only way to be sure you’ve said what you meant to say in a manner that will relate to your target audience.

There’s no way a computer can think and analyze like a human brain. We speak and write metaphorically, tongue-in-cheek, sarcastically with puns and wit and comparisons that a machine governed by a finite set of rules and commands cannot comprehend. The hard drive doesn’t care how many times you use the same, monotonous word in a sentence, in a paragraph, on a page, in a chapter. Nor does your spell-check, grammar-check, or latest software package notice inconsistencies in who, what, when, where, and how.

Wouldn’t it be hilarious if you sent an RSVP with all the information garbled by the automatic words the smart phones or tablets choose for you? For example, misspelling both names:   Who was giving the event and for whom; What the event was–hmm..wouldn’t that make for a colorful dress code, jeans and shorts to black-tie and gown, perhaps festive and mourning attire; When the event was occurring–time and date; and Where? Of course a misspelled street name and an incorrect address number and zip code. How to get there? Try GPS or mapquest on that one!

Destination Nowhere
Destination Nowhere

You can’t trust your own eyes to show you what you’ve written. They see what they expect to see.

You can’t hear your mistakes in your mind as you read silently to yourself. Your inner ear hears what it expects to hear.

You can’t touch your words on the screen with a pencil, a pen, an eraser. If you print it out your eyes, ears, and engrained memory of what you’ve written will still have you reading right over a misplaced, forgotten, or left out word.

All is not hopeless. You just need a proofreader or editor who hasn’t seen your words before. Also, editors train their senses to see, to hear, and to touch inconsistencies, discrepancies, and content that is awkward or structurally unsound. They just can’t proofread for themselves. I don’t see technology changing these basic human traits.

So please let me know if I’ve messed up again. I’m always grateful for a chance to make things right.

Destination Somewhere!
Destination Somewhere!

Writing is like a game of Scrabble…you need the right letters to make the right words…

writing

 I am a notorious wordsmith; this is my obsession.

I agonize over a conjunction or a preposition.

Adjectives are dear friends to me,

But my descriptive pals must let me see

A word painting come to life on the page!

I don’t count the words to set my gauge

Of whether I’ve said enough or way too much.

I brainstorm the words in a mad rush,

Then go back to the start and begin again.

I cut and I add, question and doubt, change and rearrange.

It’s like a Scrabble game; you make the words fit

With the luck of the draw, bit by bit,

Combined with the letters on the gameboard in play

To select words in a new and different way.

Such is the story and frank admission

Of a writer of words with a crazed obsession.

Deborah A. Bowman, wordsmith

Book Reviews (a subject dear to all of our hearts!)

Those of you who follow my blog, and especially my tweets, know that I’ve been extremely ill this winter. It comes with the territory, unfortunately, when you have SLE–Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis. I’ve been dealing with this over 20 years so I know what to do, which means becoming a recluse for the winter! But it does give me time to do something very important, which is review other authors’ works.

I’ve reviewed about 7 books in the past two weeks and really found some gems, including one diamond! “It Really IS Rocket Science!” by BH Branham. Also, anything by Donna Zadunajsky is really worth the read. For children, I strongly recommend, “Sam, The Super Kitty” by M. Lovato! It’s just adorable.

I haven’t been totally idle with my own writing, but it is hard to make sense when your fever’s 103–lol. I’ve written five chapters for the next novella in the Denny Ryder Paranormal Crime Series, STROKE OF SILENCE! It should be on amazon.com in March 2014. I want to take this opportunity, again, to thank those of you who reviewed my Denny Ryder Series and even the reviewer who was brave enough (Donna, my friend) to get through all 400 pages of LIVING IN A SHADAW, my full-length, mature-adult novel.

I’ll put in my own 2 cents about reviews, which I covered much more seriously in a previous blog that might be worth taking a look at: I purchase/buy eBooks that I review . . . after all, we’re all writers because we have to be, whether anyone else reads it or not, but we are also trying to make a living, so I don’t ask for freebies.

eBooks are inexpensive, especially for the author first starting out, so it’s not going to break the budget. Reviewing on a Kindle or e-reader allows you to highlight, make notes, refer back, and in my case, since I’ve been an editor for 30+ years, mark the errors. I just want to say finding a good editor or proofreader is essential to a good manuscript. If there are so many typos, errors, spelling/grammar mistakes (and spell-check and grammar-check aren’t human; they can create more problems than they solve–so I suggest you don’t rely on them!) that the book is unreadable, no matter how good the theme or plot, you loose your reader before you have a chance to make any kind of impression as an author.

This being said, I say in all kindness, that you can’t proofread your own stuff. I’ve been in the technical (scientific/government) side of this business . . . forevah! And I can’t edit, proofread my own stuff . . . no matter how “cold” I let it get. When you write/create something, little beknownst to you, the words become ingrained in your mind. When you read it for errors, you read right over them because your brain “sees” what it has unconsciously memorized. It’s really very medical that you can’t read your own stuff!

Your best friend is not your best proofreader. Sometimes they’re so excited over the fact that you’re an author, “they” read right through the errors, or they’re afraid to mention them and upset you OR they aren’t equipped with the skills a proofreader must have . . . good grammar, good spelling, and an eye to catch “glitches” in the story line: names change, scenes are referred to but are somehow different, or things don’t add up: 2 + 2 = 3 or 2 + 2 = 5. I’m sure you get my point. Family members can be prejudiced either “for” or “against” your writing (“Anything my child/brother/sister/aunt/uncle writes is wonderful!” or “Please, just get a job all ready.”)

A couple of tricks for proofreading, if you’re forced to read your own stuff, is put it on your Kindle Fire in reverse: white copy on black background. I found this quite by accident. I read in black background at night while my husband sleeps beside me. The Kindle Fire (only) is not near as bright this way. But all the sudden, errors started popping out at me! Unfortunately, not all of them.

An even better way, again found by accident, is let the Kindle Fire “read” to you. My eyes were almost swollen shut with this flu/pneumonia/whatever? so for the first time ever, I put on the text-to-speech function. When a mechanical voice (not bad on the newer versions of the Kindle) says the wrong word that doesn’t make sense or can’t pronounce a misspelling or the grammar is wrong where you didn’t do it purposely because your character’s voice doesn’t speak that way . . . well, there’s a problem and when you look back at it, you find it!

I hope these little ‘tricks of the trade’ help all of you out there honing your craft!

In conclusion, I just want to say, “Be honest it your reviews,” but most of all, authors need to support each other. After all, “Writers are readers!” (my own quote). It really doesn’t help a poor book in a genre to plant negative reviews in the same genre by a different author (or a book that has similar keywords), and it doesn’t help an author needing an editor, proofreader, another pair of eyes to give them rave reviews that are “puffed up,” so to speak.

This is my 2 cents on reviews and proofreading. Best wishes to your all!

Deborah A. Bowman, author